Thursday, February 28, 2013

Volcanoes

The article I found today comes from a website called Weather Wiz Kids. This website offers tons of information on different natural disasters. One natural disaster that they offer information on is Volcanoes. Now this blog is designed to discuss different ways to teach elementary students about land forms  so this article is great. It is set up especially for kids. It is question answer form, and is written in student friendly language. It offers many great text features such as
diagrams,

a glossary,

 and tables.

 This article is also great for teachers because it also offers links to lesson plans, experiments, and project ideas that are all online. It is also a great resource for teachers as well because it answers some of those questions that students are really interested in. As well as acts like a guide for the information that the students need to understand what a volcano really is. It mostly covers those important bits of information that teachers really need to focus on. It also has a few little tid bits of information that may not be as important.

This article has many different uses. As I mentioned it can be a resource for teachers, something for them to build their lessons off of, as well as find other lessons. Also, like I said before, it provides ideas for experiments and projects that may be fun to implement in the classroom. This could also be a personal document for students if they are writing a research paper on volcanoes. For instance if the students are to write a research paper on land forms  this article may be one that teachers recommend to their students. The article also moves into another natural disaster at the end, which can be a help to teachers as well, by recommending what to cover next.


Link: http://www.weatherwizkids.com/weather-volcano.htm

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Antarctica: Is it more than just ice?

      In the journal Science Activities I found an article on a study done in a fourth grade class in Greenwood Laboratory School. The study was focusing on how well the students could remember and recall concepts that they learned through hands-on experiences. What interested me most in this article wasn't the study that was conducted, but rather the 3 different activities that they conducted during the study. The three activities covered three different topics. The first topic was the melting of glaciers and ice, the second topic was the differences between the North and South pole, and the third topic was the geography and landforms of Antarctica. The article gives a lengthy list of materials that would be needed to conduct the three different experiments in the classrooms, but my focus today is going to be the different activities.
      The first activity raised the question of whether or not melting glaciers will cause the sea level to rise. Before the main activity they conducted a pre-activity. The students had a clear cup with water and several ice cubes in the cup. Students would mark where the water level was on the cup. After they had marked the cup the students would predict whether the water level would rise or not. This activity also had the students engage in a vocabulary lesson on the difference between a glacier and an iceberg. The main activity consisted of students in groups of 2 or 3. Students would roll a chunk of play dough into a ball and then flatten the top of the ball and place it into an aluminum plate. The flattened play dough represents the continent and students pour water around the play dough to represent the ocean. Ice cubes are placed into the water as well, to represent the icebergs, and a hunk of ice is placed on top of the play dough to represent the glacier. Students then  mark the play dough with a toothpick and predict whether the water level will rise or not. Students wait for the ice cubes and hunk of ice to melt and record their findings. After they are done with their experiment the students discuss why the level didn't change from the "icebergs" but did change from the melting "Glacier".
      While the students were waiting for the icebergs and glaciers to melt they were given a review of the differences between the north pole and the south pole. After the review they were then given a quiz. The quiz given had artwork on it as well as the quiz questions. This quiz was used as the second activity in the study and in the article there is a table displaying the questions and how many answered them correctly and how many answered them incorrectly.
      The third activity focuses on Antarctica's land forms. The students were given a blank map of Antarctica and a list of features to depict on the map. Students were allowed to use any resources that were available such as computers, maps, globes, etc. Once students were done locating the different features the teacher then showed the students a completed and correct version of the map. They were then debriefed on how it is difficult to locate land forms in Antarctica because its features are constantly changing.
      This article was very descriptive. It listed the standard alignment with each of the different activities, gave figures for each of the different activities such as photos of the students performing the first activity, a table of the quiz results, and a photo of the map. I really enjoyed this article because it showed many different ways to engage students in just one lesson. The lesson focus was clear, and all the activities focused on different learning styles making this lesson idea really easy to incorporate into any elementary classroom.


Link to Article:

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=4&sid=b46f5da7-d6e6-4ac9-932c-0098f05ca6bb%40sessionmgr14&hid=23&bdata=JmxvZ2luLmFzcCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=38221276
     

Wednesday, February 6, 2013


The article Nature Has a Formula That Tells us When it’s Time to Die by Robert Krulwich raised a lot of different opinions for me. First off, the thought of having a mathematical formula that can determine the life span of plants and Animals and possibly even humans seems a little over the top. Personally I don't believe that it is possible to determine the length of an organism’s life span. Like the article said, a human’s life holds a lot of chance within it. Sometimes life brings surprises and we never know what is going to happen next. This could be the same with animals and plants as well. Natural disasters can happen at any point and time, and these disasters can cause plants and animals to lose their lives as well as humans. Their lives hold just as many opportunities for chance as humans lives do. Second, the thought that our hearts have been given a certain number of beats until it expires is a little intense. Our hearts beat multiple times within a minute. When we do strenuous activity our heart rates increase. By the end of just one day our hearts may have beat over a thousand times, and at that rate it wouldn't take long to reach a billion heart beats. Another thought on this would be that  if we did only get a certain number of heart beats, wouldn't we be advised to slow ourselves down in order to keep our hearts beating slow like the elephants heart, rather than hurrying through the day and having our hearts race like a hummingbirds heart? This article does bring into thought that there are many other factors that play a role in how long an organism lives. For instance the "Chance" that I had mentioned earlier, as well as sicknesses and environmental aspects. Through technology and knowledge we have also lengthened our lives as well. We can now protect ourselves as well as educate ourselves on the many different aspects that can harm or even kill us. Throughout the years we have raised our chances from 1 in 2 to 1 in a million (this is an exaggeration) and have been able to give ourselves the gift of time. Something that maybe those who lived 100 or 200 years in the past wouldn't have been able to do. However, I have also thought about the fact that yes I may be wrong. Everything in this blog is just my opinion. I have no fact behind this and I didn't conduct any research to get this information. This is all straight from me and I do realize that there is a chance that I am wrong. Robert Krulwich could be 100% correct and our lives could have been designated for us like he mentions in his article. I also think that a lot of his article is based on opinions as well. He does have fact and probably did a little research his self but in my opinion I don't think that calculating someone or something’s lifespan is possible.


Source: 
https://lms.bvu.edu/section/content/default.aspWCI=pgDisplay&WCU=CRSCNT&ENTRY_ID=7AE7F8CFB2A047C3A449F9F9651ABABC